Caught in the Coil — Why Cable Removal in Mines Needs a Written Safe-Work Procedure
April 9, 2026 · 7 min read
Caught in the Coil — What Happened Inside a Mine Shaft Near Sudbury
Let's talk about what happened at the Victoria Mine, approximately 35 kilometres west of Sudbury, on October 22, 2024. Three DMC Mining Services Ltd. workers were on a suspended platform inside a mine shaft, removing a power cable from the wall. The task involved cutting the metal bands securing the cable to the shaft wall and coiling it on the platform. The platform was getting crowded with coiled cable. One worker stepped inside the coil to make room. From a space-management standpoint, it probably seemed like a practical solution. But standing inside a coiling cable creates a serious pinching hazard — one the company's safe-work procedures should have explicitly addressed and prevented. When the crew finished the cable, the free end fell below the platform. That slack caused the coil to tighten. The worker standing inside was caught. The cable tightened around them and caused injury before they could get clear. A Ministry investigation determined that the safe method for this type of cable removal was to work from the bottom of the shaft to the top — a method that would have prevented the coil from accumulating on the platform at all. DMC Mining had not established this procedure. Workers were improvising. And a worker paid the price.
Key Facts
What the Law Requires
Section 25(2)(h) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act is the cornerstone of employer duty: 'An employer shall take every precaution reasonable in the circumstances for the protection of a worker.' Basically, what this means is simple: employers must think through the hazards of every task their workers perform and put controls in place before the work begins. For cable removal from a mine shaft wall, the hazard of a coil tightening around a worker is foreseeable. A procedure that prevents workers from standing inside the coil — or that removes the hazard altogether by using a bottom-to-top method — is a reasonable precaution. The court found that DMC Mining failed to develop and implement that procedure. Workers made field decisions about how to manage the coiling cable. One of those decisions put a worker inside a tightening loop. The company's failure to anticipate this hazard and establish a written safe-work method was the direct cause of the injury. In the court's view, this was not a freak accident — it was a foreseeable consequence of sending workers into a confined shaft space to handle heavy cable without a procedure that addressed how that cable would be managed throughout the task. The $135,000 fine reflects the seriousness of that omission.
What Supervisors Must Do
- Before any cable removal task in a shaft or confined area, review the written safe-work procedure with the crew — confirm everyone understands the approved method
- Verify that the removal method specified in the procedure eliminates the risk of coiling hazards; if the procedure calls for bottom-to-top removal, enforce it from the first cut
- Establish a rule: no worker may position themselves inside, beneath, or in the path of any cable or material being coiled or lowered on a suspended platform
- If space constraints on the platform create pressure to improvise — stop work and reassess; platform crowding is a hazard that requires a solution, not a workaround
- Keep asking: 'If that free end drops right now, what happens to where each person is standing — and is anyone in the path of the load?'
What Employers Must Do
- Develop written safe-work procedures for all cable removal and handling tasks in shafts, vertical workings, and elevated or suspended platforms
- Procedures must explicitly specify the removal sequence (e.g., bottom-to-top), worker positioning relative to the coil, and the maximum allowable coil size on the platform before offloading
- Include cable removal in your task hazard analysis program; identify pinching, coiling, and entanglement as specific energy sources to be controlled
- Train all workers on the approved cable removal procedure before they are assigned to this type of task underground
- Conduct pre-task reviews for every cable removal job — not just the first time a crew encounters this work, but every time
- After any incident or near-miss involving cable or rope handling on a suspended platform, immediately review and update the relevant safe-work procedures
How to Use This Case in Your Workplace
This case is a valuable safety conversation starter. Use it during toolbox talks before any cable or rope handling work in shafts or elevated spaces, monthly safety meetings for underground mining crews, and task hazard analysis training for supervisors and mine managers. Walk your team through the task and ask: 'Does our cable removal procedure specify exactly where workers stand relative to the coil at each stage of the job?' 'If the free end of the cable fell right now, which direction would the coil move — and is anyone in that zone?' 'Has every worker on this crew read and confirmed understanding of the safe-work procedure before we start?' This case reinforces a simple message: cable removal on a suspended platform in a mine shaft is not a low-hazard task. It needs a written procedure, a trained crew, and a supervisor who enforces both.
- Employers must develop written safe-work procedures that anticipate coiling and entanglement hazards for cable removal in shafts and elevated spaces
- Workers must never position themselves inside or in the movement path of cable being coiled — this must be explicitly stated in the procedure
- Section 25(2)(h) OHSA requires employers to identify foreseeable hazards before work begins and implement controls — not rely on workers to improvise safely
- Supervisors must verify that the approved removal method is being followed from the start of the task, not just when something looks like it might go wrong
- A $135,000 fine for a missing safe-work procedure is a reminder that procedural gaps in underground mining carry the same legal weight as hardware failures
Related Articles
Fell Off the Platform — How Three Warning Signs Were Ignored Before a Critical Mine Injury
A worker at Glencore's Nickel Rim South Mine fell from a scissor truck platform and sustained critical injuries. Before the incident, the crew had already found a missing railing pin, damaged the railing further with an improper technique, and failed to clear the muck that made the ground uneven. Ontario court: $120,000 fine.
Read articleStruck by a Moving Toolbar — Why Overhead Conveyor Hazards Don't Stop for Elevated Workers
A Stobag North America worker was ascending a powered lift to investigate an electrical issue on the Powder Coating Line when a seven-metre toolbar on the overhead conveyor struck the platform. The lift tilted. The worker — not wearing a fall arrest harness — fell 14 feet and sustained critical injuries. Ontario court: $50,000 fine.
Read articleForklift Strikes Pedestrian — Why Yellow Lines on the Floor Are Not Enough
A National Logistics Services worker was critically injured by a reversing forklift in a shared MHE Pathway at a Brampton facility. Both parties had been trained. The forklift operator wasn't looking backward. Ontario court: $70,000 fine for a company whose pedestrian-forklift separation system relied on painted floor lines rather than physical controls.
Read articlePut It Into Practice
Download our free templates and checklists to apply these concepts in your workplace today.